MENUMENU

Barbie’s new ‘boundary-breaking’ female leader dolls aren’t breaking any boundaries

Barbie’s new ‘boundary-breaking’ female leader dolls aren’t breaking any boundaries

| Last updated

Frida Kahlo’s iconic unibrow is nearly gone, for one.

It’s International Women’s Day today, and to celebrate the occasion, Barbie is hosting a new campaign called “Role Models,” highlighting 19 women leaders across various careers. But the move is getting some flack for objectifying the very women it tries to uphold.

The Role Models campaign was first unveiled by Mattel earlier this week in a tweet stressing Mattel’s commitment to “shining a light on empowering female role models past and present” and empowering young girls. The line-up includes various new Barbie models based on real-life celebrities, such as Olympian Chloe Kim, Wonder Woman director Patty Jenkins, feminist Mexican artist Frida Kahlo, and NASA physicist Katherine Johnson.

But in many cases, Mattel significantly changed each woman’s appearance, often by slimming their waists, changing their facial features, and whitewashing parts of their identity.

In honor of #InternationalWomensDay, we are committed to shining a light on empowering female role models past and present in an effort to inspire more girls.

Join the conversation by sharing your role models using #MoreRoleModels. pic.twitter.com/5oJnZywk7s

— Barbie (@Barbie) March 6, 2018

For instance, Patty Jenkins’ face looks almost unrecognizable in Barbie form, suggesting Mattel purposefully made her look like a young, conventionally attractive model for the campaign. Meanwhile, boxer Nicola Adams OBE is depicted with thin, stickly arms and slim proportions, despite the fact that the female Olympian is physically built to withstand the intense rigor that comes with her sport.

And most notably of all, Frida Kahlo’s facial features and skin tone have been significantly changed, toning down her unibrow, making her skin lighter, removing her facial hair, and giving her a smooth, symmetrical face that mirrors the fashion industry’s preference for white, American middle-class stylistic preferences. The doll even depicts her standing up, despite the fact she was constricted to a wheelchair later in her life.

“I can’t help but feel that it would’ve been even more impactful to see the artist depicted in a way that was more true to herself—not to mention her own self-portraits,” one critic, Teen Vogue’s Karina Hoshikawa, argued this week.

Suffice to say, Twitter users are specifically upset with the Kahlo doll, arguing that Mattel is purposefully dropping her feminist message in order to appeal to a wider, whiter, and able-bodied audience.

this is a mess

a) its ableist, she was a disabled womxn and yall are erasing that critical part of her
b) yall are adhering to western beauty standards by getting rid of her unibrow
c) she was a communist, the fact ur turning her into some mass produced commodity is appalling https://t.co/7pXBlQBIDd

— thotito (@thotsoraymond) March 7, 2018

Beyond the unibrow she literally darkened all parts of her facial hair because she wanted everyone to see it, and joked about yt people and their faces "like unbaked bread". She ~hated~ the white aesthetic. Like, a lot.

— JB Ingram (@VoidJumpingJB) March 8, 2018

WHERE IS FRIDA’S UNIBROW. SIS DIDN’T STYLE IT FOR NOTHING pic.twitter.com/TWV2N6KSom

— Diana (@dianaeranae) March 8, 2018

I love the IDEA of a Frida Barbie but I agree with everything you're saying . I've see tee shirts of her face with super thin jaw and harsh cheek bones and no unibrow and "luscious" red lips and it's just NOT frida and she's beautiful just as she is without alterations pic.twitter.com/Dn0vbVJVfy

— HylianCece (@hylian_cece) March 7, 2018

There’s also the fact that Barbie dolls constantly spit out romanticized images of women that are fantastical at best, like hourglass curves and extremely thin waists. That means Barbie is sending a pretty misogynistic message to young girls: They can be whoever they want, as long as they’re thin and attractive.

"Barbie. Because girls can be anything" (Except fat). https://t.co/e0YR5wSMHA

— Katie Mercer (@KatieMercer_BM) March 8, 2018

How about a doll that looks like a real woman not like she's been stretched like a piece of rubber? How about that as a role model so girls don't grow up to get ribs removed to have smaller waists? So long as Barbie looks so freakishly long & thin, doesn't matter what she is.

— Hope 2018 is better than 2017🙄 (@alison_rixon) March 8, 2018

WHY are all of these dolls created with such unrealistically thin arms, legs etc? You're portraying all of these female role models as though they all suffer from anorexia. This is an unhealthy image to be giving young girls.

— Keith Ballard (@KeithSaiph) March 8, 2018

glad you're being celebrated, but why is it so thin?

— Ian Cummings (@iancummings) March 7, 2018

Mattel isn’t the only company struggling with whitewashing marginalized women. Kahlo’s depiction in Pixar’s Coco last year earned scorn after the film stripped her of her wheelchair. Barbie may stand out for its long history of stereotyping women, but companies throughout America have a long way to go before they treat marginalized women with the respect they deserve.

Ana Valens is an LGBTQ reporter and essayist for the Daily Dot. Her work has previously appeared in Bitch, the Establishment, Vice's Waypoint, Rolling Stone's Glixel, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.

© The Daily Dot, all rights reserved. Represented by Complex Media, Inc. for advertising sales.
Accelerated Mobile Page by Relay Media.
See standard version.
Debug
IRL
Layer 8
Parsec
The Daily Dot Bazaar
Unclick
Upstream

It’s International Women’s Day today, and to celebrate the occasion, Barbie is hosting a new campaign called “Role Models,” highlighting 19 women leaders across various careers. But the move is getting some flack for objectifying the very women it tries to uphold.